Talking Points – Changes in Pay Practices
Pearl Meyer, Steven Hall & Partners
- The Blame Game
- Role of Consultant
 - Real and perceived abuse popularized by the media and cited by critics
- Continuation of practices, programs and agreements adopted in prior times under different standards (Disney opinion)
 - Recent excesses 
 
 
 - Confluence of Events
- Unintended consequences of regulatory, legislative and activist intervention in executive compensation process
- SEC disclosure rules, 299, 162m, SOX, 123R. etc.
 - Pay for performance based on stock price or TSR
 - Introduction of annual total remuneration valuation and surveys including stock options
 
 - Impact of compliant committees, greedy CEOs, cowed HR executives, misuse of peer groups, surveys/marketplace positioning and piecemeal administration
 
 - Unintended consequences of regulatory, legislative and activist intervention in executive compensation process
 - New Responsibilities of Compensation Committee/Board and All Participants in Pay Process
- Require diligence in new era of corporate governance
 - Re-examine assumptions underlying current executive compensation program (Grasso case)
- Evolving standards of reasonableness
 
 - Test compensation philosophy and policies based on corporate mission strategy and performance
 - Assure sound decision-making process
 - Evaluate/review results (effectiveness in attracting, retaining, motivating and rewarding for creation of real value)
 - Add it all up under varying scenarios - Tally Sheet 
 
 - New approach to dilution and dilemma of unlimited annual equity grants
- Career equity stake ("Back to the Future")
 
 
