Talking Points – Changes in Pay Practices
Pearl Meyer, Steven Hall & Partners
- The Blame Game
- Role of Consultant
- Real and perceived abuse popularized by the media and cited by critics
- Continuation of practices, programs and agreements adopted in prior times under different standards (Disney opinion)
- Recent excesses
- Confluence of Events
- Unintended consequences of regulatory, legislative and activist intervention in executive compensation process
- SEC disclosure rules, 299, 162m, SOX, 123R. etc.
- Pay for performance based on stock price or TSR
- Introduction of annual total remuneration valuation and surveys including stock options
- Impact of compliant committees, greedy CEOs, cowed HR executives, misuse of peer groups, surveys/marketplace positioning and piecemeal administration
- Unintended consequences of regulatory, legislative and activist intervention in executive compensation process
- New Responsibilities of Compensation Committee/Board and All Participants in Pay Process
- Require diligence in new era of corporate governance
- Re-examine assumptions underlying current executive compensation program (Grasso case)
- Evolving standards of reasonableness
- Test compensation philosophy and policies based on corporate mission strategy and performance
- Assure sound decision-making process
- Evaluate/review results (effectiveness in attracting, retaining, motivating and rewarding for creation of real value)
- Add it all up under varying scenarios - Tally Sheet
- New approach to dilution and dilemma of unlimited annual equity grants
- Career equity stake ("Back to the Future")
