The Advisors' Blog

This blog features wisdom from respected compensation consultants and lawyers

March 1, 2010

Action May Be Required to Preserve Executive Compensation Deductions

Mark Jones, Pillsbury LLP

During the current proxy season, compensation committees of public companies will want to take into account the new position of the IRS regarding the deductibility of performance bonuses paid upon retirement or termination of employment. Committees should review their incentive pay plans to determine whether these plans need to be restructured to preserve the deductibility of performance-based bonuses before being put before shareholders.

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code generally limits a public company’s federal income tax deduction to $1 million for compensation paid to its chief executive officer and its three other top-paid officers (other than the chief financial officer). An exception from the $1 million limit applies for compensation that is payable “solely on account of” attainment of one or more performance goals. The performance goals must be determined by its compensation committee, comprised of two or more outside directors. Additionally, the material terms of the plan, including the performance goals, must be disclosed to and approved by a majority of the company’s shareholders, and the compensation committee must certify that the performance goals and any other materials conditions were in fact satisfied.

IRS regulations allow performance awards to be payable in the event of the participant’s death or disability or a change of control, even if the performance goal was not attained, without jeopardizing the award’s exemption from the $1 million deductibility limit. In private rulings issued in 1999 and 2006, the IRS applied the same logic to awards that were paid out upon termination of employment. However, the IRS reversed this position in Revenue Ruling 2008-13, reasoning that awards that are payable upon a participant’s termination of employment, voluntary resignation or retirement are not payable “solely on account of” performance, and, therefore, are not exempt from the $1 million limit. Revenue Ruling 2008-13 does not apply to awards paid under a performance period beginning on or before January 1, 2009 or under an employment contract in effect on February 21, 2008.

But awards to be paid under a performance period commencing after January 1, 2009 or under a newly adopted or revised plan or agreement that will be subject to the new rules. These arrangements, therefore, should be reviewed by the compensation committee to determine whether the awards will still be exempt from Section 162(m) under the IRS’s new interpretive standards.

The exception for performance-based awards is not available to companies that have received $300 million or more under the Troubled Assets Relief Program (TARP). In addition, the limit on the deductibility of compensation for the top executives of such companies (including the chief financial officer) is limited to $500,000. These restrictions continue until the company repays the moneys received or for any other reason is no longer subject to TARP.

Public companies should also take this opportunity to review their procedures to ensure that all performance-based awards, including incentive pay, performance-based equity awards, stock options and stock appreciation rights, are approved by an independent compensation committee and that all plans and arrangements providing for these awards, including the performance goals, are put before their shareholders at least every 10 years (every five years if the compensation committee has authority to change the performance measures used to establish the goal).

A grace period applies to performance-based plans in existence before a company’s initial public offering (IPO) from the date of the IPO through the first shareholder meeting after the end of the third calendar year following the year in which the IPO occurred. Shareholder approval is necessary for any awards made from the plan after the expiration of the grace period. Newly public companies may want to consider seeking this shareholder approval soon after the IPO, when company ownership may be concentrated and shareholder enthusiasm especially high, rather than waiting until the end of the grace period.